Anthony Mark Hankins sued QVC and HSN for at least $30 million in February 2026. Many people search for this case as the “Anthony Mark Haskins lawsuit QVC.” That name is wrong. The plaintiff is Anthony Mark Hankins, the fashion designer behind Anthony Design Originals.

This is not a consumer class action. No settlement fund exists. No claim portal exists. Shoppers cannot file for a payout. The suit is a $30 million business and civil-rights dispute between one designer and the television retailer that dropped him after 31 years.

“Anthony Mark Haskins lawsuit QVC” is a misspelled search for the Antthony Mark Hankins case. Hankins sued QVC Group Inc., HSN Inc., and HSNI LLC for at least $30 million on February 11, 2026, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Case No. 2:26-cv-00912-MKC). He alleges wrongful termination, racial discrimination, breach of contract, and defamation.

The case at a glance

First, the name: “Anthony Mark Haskins” or Antthony Mark Hankins?

The correct name is Antthony Mark Hankins. Note the two T’s in “Antthony” and the “H-a-n-k-i-n-s” surname. Low-quality blogs spread the “Anthony Mark Haskins” version, and search behavior copied it. Same person, same case, wrong name.

Some of those blogs then stacked a second, bigger error on top. They describe a QVC “consumer fraud class action” with settlement tiers and a claims portal for shoppers. That case does not exist. Treat any page that tells you to collect receipts for a QVC payout as false. Hankins is a terminated business partner, not a class representative for customers.

Who is Anthony Mark Hankins?

Antthony Mark Hankins is a Savannah, Georgia fashion designer. He founded Antthony Design Originals and built a loyal customer base over more than three decades. He sold his apparel on HSN, a U.S. television retailer, and on its sister network QVC for 31 years. That long partnership sits at the heart of the dispute.

What the “Anthony Mark Haskins” lawsuit against QVC is really about

Hankins filed suit on February 11, 2026, and amended it on March 29, 2026. He named three defendants: QVC Group Inc., HSN Inc., and HSNI LLC. He wants at least $30 million in damages, and he also demanded a jury trial. The venue is the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the case number is 2:26-cv-00912-MKC before Judge Mary Kay Costello.

The core theory is straightforward. Hankins says HSN ended a 31-year partnership without cause and gutted his brand on the way out. He frames that exit as both a contract breach and an act of discrimination.

The allegations, point by point

Every item below is an allegation from the complaint. Courts have not ruled on any of them.

• A sudden termination. HSN cut ties in July 2025 after 31 years, the suit says.
• Reduced airtime. HSN scaled back his on-air slots and brand promotion from 2023 to 2025 to favor a “TikTok-centered business model.”
• Lost revenue. Hankins reported $13.24 million in gross sales in his final year, more than $2 million below projection.
• Fire-sale inventory. HSN sold his leftover apparel at steep discounts without his consent.
• Unauthorized resale. Some apparel later appeared on Amazon under HSN images.
• Continued use of his likeness. Defendants still used his name and image in promotions months after the exit, per the complaint.
• Racial discrimination. Hankins, who is Black, alleges HSN limited his exposure outside Black History Month and used coded language about Black customers.

The legal claims

The complaint bundles those facts into five legal theories. Each one demands separate proof at trial.

• Breach of contract: HSN allegedly ignored promised airtime and support.
• Racial discrimination: Hankins alleges race shaped how HSN treated him and his brand.
• Defamation: The suit alleges false statements harmed his reputation.
• Tortious interference: HSN allegedly damaged his outside business relationships.
• Misappropriation of name and likeness: Defendants allegedly profited from his image without consent.

How QVC’s bankruptcy froze the case

QVC Group and its U.S. subsidiaries filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on April 16, 2026, in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (Case No. 26-90447, before Judge Alfredo R. Perez). The defendants then filed a suggestion of bankruptcy in the Pennsylvania court. That step triggered the automatic stay. Judge Mary Kay Costello paused all proceedings in the Hankins case on June 11, 2026. Most competitor articles end their story at this freeze — and that version is now outdated.

The July 2026 turn: the case is cleared to move forward

The bankruptcy moved fast. The Bankruptcy Court confirmed QVC’s prepackaged reorganization plan on July 20, 2026 (Confirmation Order, Docket No. 722). Judge Perez then rejected a last-minute challenge from preferred shareholders who wanted to block the exit. That decision cleared the final hurdle.

The numbers are large. QVC’s plan cuts total debt from roughly $6.6 billion to about $1.325 billion. Old preferred and common shares get cancelled. Vendor claims get paid in full or reinstated. The reorganized company plans to relist under the ticker “QVCG.”

Here is the part that matters for this lawsuit. The Philadelphia Business Journal reported in late July 2026 that a federal judge cleared Hankins to move forward with his $30 million suit as QVC exits Chapter 11. The outlet called it one of the few claims allowed to proceed after the bankruptcy. The plan’s promise to pay or reinstate vendor claims helps explain that outcome, since Hankins is a vendor.

Verified facts vs. open questions

Clear separation matters on a legal topic. Here is where the record is solid and where it is not.

Verified from court records and named sources

• The plaintiff is Antthony Mark Hankins, with co-plaintiff Antthony Design Originals Inc.
• The case is No. 2:26-cv-00912-MKC in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, filed February 11, 2026.
• The demand is at least $30 million, plus a jury-trial request.
• QVC’s Chapter 11 is Case No. 26-90447 in the Southern District of Texas; a court confirmed the plan on July 20, 2026.
• A court stayed the Hankins case on June 11, 2026.

Reported, but worth your own check

• The “cleared to proceed” status comes from Philadelphia Business Journal coverage in late July 2026. Confirm the exact docket entry on PACER.
• Outlets differ on the termination month. The Inquirer says July 2025; some blogs say August 2025.

Not established — treat as undecided

• The truth of any allegation. The court has issued no verdict.
• Any dollar recovery. No judgment and no settlement figure exist.

Case timeline

What this lawsuit means for you

• QVC or HSN customers who own Antthony pieces: you have no claim to file. This case does not pay consumers. Your past purchases stand.
• Antthony Mark Hankins: he can press his damages claims in federal court now that the freeze has lifted for his case.
• The reorganized QVC and HSN: the company operates with less debt under its plan, and the Hankins claim continues as active litigation.

FAQs

Is “Anthony Mark Haskins lawsuit QVC” a real case?

Yes, but the name is misspelled. The real plaintiff is Antthony Mark Hankins. The case is No. 2:26-cv-00912-MKC in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

Is there a QVC settlement or claim for shoppers?

No. No settlement fund, no claim portal, and no consumer payout exist. This is a designer’s suit, not a class action.

How much money does Hankins want?

At least $30 million. He also demanded a jury trial.

Did QVC’s bankruptcy end the lawsuit?

No. A court stayed the case in June 2026. Late-July 2026 reports indicate the case is cleared to proceed as QVC exits Chapter 11.

Who is Antthony Design Originals?

It is Hankins’ fashion brand and a co-plaintiff in the suit. The brand was sold on HSN and QVC for decades.

What are the main allegations?

Wrongful termination, racial discrimination, breach of contract, defamation, and misuse of his name and likeness.

Sources and references

Primary records (court and company)

• PACER — federal court docket, Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 2:26-cv-00912-MKC.
• Kroll Restructuring Administration — QVC Group Chapter 11, Case No. 26-90447 (S.D. Tex.).
• SEC — QVC Group Form 8-K, plan confirmation (July 2026).
• QVC Group investor relations — plan-confirmation press release (July 15, 2026).
• Business Wire — Hankins federal lawsuit press release (February 13, 2026).

News coverage

• The Philadelphia Inquirer — QVC Group sued for $30M by Antthony Mark Hankins (February 18, 2026).
• Philadelphia Business Journal — Hankins claim cleared to proceed (via X, late July 2026).
• Bloomberg Law — QVC cleared to exit bankruptcy as judge rejects shareholder plea (late July 2026).

Key takeaways

• “Anthony Mark Haskins” is a misspelled form of Antthony Mark Hankins.
• The case is a $30 million business and civil-rights suit, not a consumer class action.
• QVC’s bankruptcy paused the case in June 2026.
• A late-July 2026 court decision cleared the case to proceed.
• Verify every detail on PACER and the Kroll bankruptcy site.

Disclaimer: This article reports allegations from an open civil case. Allegations are unproven unless a court rules otherwise. None of this is legal advice. Status verified as of the publish date shown above; check the dockets for the latest.

Written by

Musarat Bano

Musarat Bano is a content writer for JudicialOcean.com who covers lawsuits, legal news, and general legal topics. Her work focuses on research-based, informational content developed from publicly available sources and is intended to support public awareness. She does not provide legal advice or professional legal services.

EmailLinkedInWebsite