The Wellness Company (TWC 2022 Inc.) faces three verified legal matters as of 2026: a former-employee lawsuit in Florida federal court (Foy et al. v. TWC 2022, Inc., Case No. 0:25-cv-61823-RS, filed September 11, 2025), a trademark dispute in Idaho federal court with Melaleuca over the “Vitality” and “Wellness Company” names, and a Proposition 65 notice from the Environmental Research Center over heavy metals in four products. No certified nationwide class action or settlement fund exists against TWC. A separate lawsuit from 2021 (Baylor Scott and White Health v. McCullough) was dismissed with prejudice in 2023.
You searched for “The Wellness Company lawsuit,” and here’s the truth. No single, nationwide class action sits against The Wellness Company right now. Three separate, real cases do exist, though, and each one names a different set of claims. This guide walks through every case, names the court and the parties, and separates what’s proven from what’s still an allegation. It also clears up a mess of mixed-up search results, because three unrelated companies share the “Wellness Company” name, and most online guides never sort that out.
Which “Wellness Company” Do You Need?
Search results for this topic often blend four different businesses. Check this table first, because it saves real research time.
| Company | What It Sells | Lawsuit Type | Relation to TWC |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Wellness Company (TWC 2022 Inc.) | Supplements, emergency medication kits, telehealth | Employee suit, trademark dispute, Prop 65 notice | This is the company covered below |
| Melaleuca (also branded “The Wellness Company”) | Household, nutrition, and personal care products (Idaho Falls) | Plaintiff in the Idaho trademark suit against TWC | Separate company, same nickname |
| Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. (NASDAQ: WOOF) | Pet retail | Securities fraud class action, filed 2025 | An unrelated pet retailer shares two words in its name |
| Lemme (Kourtney Kardashian’s brand) | GLP-1 supplement capsules | Consumer class action over weight-loss claims, filed July 2026 in California | Unrelated wellness brand, no ties to TWC |
Who wants the Petco securities case or the Lemme GLP-1 suit needs a different article entirely. This page covers TWC 2022 Inc., the Boca Raton, Florida company founded by Foster Coulson in June 2022 and tied to Dr. Peter McCullough, its Chief Scientific Officer.
Case 1: The Former-Employee Lawsuit (Foy et al. v. TWC 2022, Inc.)
Five former TWC staff members filed a suit against the company on September 11, 2025. The case sits in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, under case number 0:25-cv-61823-RS.
The named plaintiffs are Ashlee Foy, Heather Gessling, Penny Green, Tiffany Parotto, and Jennifer VanDeWater. Each held a leadership or medical-board role at TWC before her exit. The complaint names TWC 2022 Inc. and International Health Brands as defendants, along with CEO Peter Gillooly and former Chief of Staff Brandon Kuemper.
The complaint raises four core claims:
- Gender-based discrimination in the workplace
- Wrongful termination after the plaintiffs raised concerns with company leadership
- Retaliation once the plaintiffs filed complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Sexual harassment by male executives and staff
Important distinction: these are allegations from a filed complaint, not proven facts and not a court decision. TWC has not issued a public response to these specific claims at the time of this write-up. A court must still weigh evidence on both sides before any decision on liability. Readers should treat this section as “what the plaintiffs allege,” not “what a judge found true.”
Case 2: The Idaho Trademark Dispute (TWC vs. Melaleuca)
A federal court in Idaho holds an active trademark case between TWC and Melaleuca, a separate, decades-old wellness and household products company based in Idaho Falls. Melaleuca has used “The Wellness Company” as its name for decades and holds a brand name tied to its “Vitality” product line.
The dispute centers on whether TWC’s use of the “The Wellness Company” name and related brand elements creates confusion with Melaleuca’s current trademarks. This case remains one of the few directly docketed legal actions that name TWC’s corporate entity, and it stands apart from the health-claims controversy most search traffic expects to find.
Consumers should not confuse this case with a product-safety or consumer-fraud claim. A trademark dispute concerns brand ownership, not health outcomes.
Case 3: The Proposition 65 Notice (Environmental Research Center vs. TWC 2022 Inc.)
The Environmental Research Center filed a Notice of Violation against TWC 2022 Inc. on June 26, 2026, under California’s Proposition 65 law. The notice alleges that four TWC products contain lead, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), or perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA) at levels that require a Prop 65 safety label.
Proposition 65 sets a lower bar than a lawsuit. A notice like this one starts a legal process, and companies often settle, add a safety label, or reformulate a product before a case ever reaches a courtroom. Right now, this stands as a documented notice, not a finished case or a proven safety violation.
Is There a Class Action Against The Wellness Company?
No. As of this write-up, no confirmed, court-certified, nationwide class action exists against TWC tied to its health claims, supplement ad claims, or telehealth prescriptions. Several websites present payout tables, settlement tiers, and claim deadlines for such a case. None of those figures trace back to a real court docket, a named plaintiff, or an official settlement announcement.
A reader who lands on a page with a “how much can you get” calculator for a TWC settlement should treat that page with real caution. Real settlement figures come from a signed agreement or a court order, and no such document exists for TWC at this time.
The Calley Means Ethics Complaint: TWC as the Complainant, Not the Defendant
A May 2025 Politico report covered an ethics complaint TWC itself filed, not a lawsuit filed against TWC. The complaint targeted Calley Means, a special government employee who advised HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on health policy while he co-ran TrueMed, a separate wellness company.
TWC CEO Peter Gillooly stated that Means made hostile, threat-filled calls toward him and attempted to pressure the company for personal gain. TWC then filed the ethics complaint with federal oversight agencies and alerted congressional committees. Lawmakers such as Senator Adam Schiff and Representative Jake Auchincloss later sent their own letters to HHS over Means’s financial ties to TrueMed while he held a federal advisory role.
This story adds real context to TWC’s current legal footprint, and it turns the usual pattern around. Here, TWC holds the role of complainant, not defendant.
A Resolved, Older Case: Baylor Scott and White Health v. McCullough (2023)
A 2021 suit from Baylor Scott and White Health System named Dr. Peter McCullough, who now serves as TWC’s Chief Scientific Officer. The 191st Judicial District Court in Dallas County, Texas, dismissed the case with prejudice in February 2023, which means the same claims cannot return to court.
This case predates TWC’s current legal matters and does not involve TWC as a company. It stays relevant to background research on McCullough, though, since his name appears across TWC’s supplement lines and medical content.
Claims vs. Verified Status
| Claim Found Online | Verified Status |
|---|---|
| “TWC faces a certified nationwide class action” | False. No certified class action or settlement fund exists. |
| “Settlement payouts range from $25 to $1,000” | False. No source ties these figures to a real court record. |
| “TWC faces an employee lawsuit in Florida” | True. Case 0:25-cv-61823-RS, filed September 11, 2025. |
| “TWC faces a trademark dispute in Idaho” | True. Active case with Melaleuca over brand rights. |
| “TWC received a Prop 65 notice” | True. Filed by the Environmental Research Center, June 26, 2026. |
| “TWC was sued by Baylor Scott and White” | Partly true, but resolved. Dismissed with prejudice in 2023, and it named McCullough, not TWC directly. |
| “TWC is the same company as Petco” | False. Two separate companies with similar names. |
What This Means for TWC Customers Right Now
A current or past TWC customer does not need to file a claim today because no settlement portal or claim window exists. A person who bought TWC products and wants to raise a concern still has real options:
- Save receipts, order confirmations, and any telehealth records
- File a complaint with the Better Business Bureau if a payment or delivery issue stays unresolved
- Report suspected product safety concerns to the FDA’s MedWatch program
- Watch official court records for the three active cases above, since a status change could affect future consumer rights
A former TWC employee with a similar experience to the named plaintiffs in the Florida case should speak with an employment attorney directly, since that case already sets a legal path other claims could follow.
FAQs
Does The Wellness Company face a lawsuit right now?
Yes, TWC faces two active cases right now: a former-employee lawsuit in Florida federal court and a trademark dispute in Idaho federal court. A Proposition 65 notice from June 2026 adds a third, earlier-stage legal matter.
Is there a class action lawsuit against The Wellness Company?
No. No court has certified a nationwide class action against TWC, and no settlement fund exists. Sites that list settlement payout amounts for TWC do not cite a real case number or court order.
Is The Wellness Company the same as Petco?
No. Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. trades on NASDAQ under WOOF and sells pet products. It faces its own, unrelated securities class action tied to stock disclosures.
Is the Lemme lawsuit connected to The Wellness Company?
No. Lemme is a supplement brand tied to Kourtney Kardashian Barker. A California class action against Lemme covers its GLP-1 capsule claims, and the case shares no legal or corporate tie to TWC.
What is the Melaleuca trademark dispute about?
Melaleuca, a separate wellness company based in Idaho Falls, filed a trademark case against TWC over the use of the “The Wellness Company” name and the “Vitality” brand name. The case concerns brand rights, not product safety or health claims.
Did Dr. Peter McCullough lose a lawsuit?
No. A 2021 case from Baylor Scott and White Health System against McCullough ended in dismissal with prejudice in February 2023, a result that favored McCullough.
Sources
- U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida — Foy et al. v. TWC 2022, Inc. et al., Case No. 0:25-cv-61823-RS (complaint PDF)
- White Rose Intelligence — background summary of the employee lawsuit and TWC corporate structure
- Environmental Research Center — Notice of Violation, TWC 2022 Inc., June 26, 2026
- Politico — “Calley Means Wellness Ethics Complaint,” May 12, 2025
- PR Newswire — The Wellness Company statement on the McCullough dismissal, February 1, 2023
- Rosen Law — Petco Health and Wellness Company, Inc. case page
- Inc.com — Lemme class action coverage, July 14, 2026
Note on the Idaho trademark case: no primary court docket link for the TWC–Melaleuca trademark dispute turned up in this research pass. That detail currently traces back to a secondary aggregator site (lawsips.com), not a court record. Treat that one case as unconfirmed until a PACER docket or court record gets pulled directly, and hold it out of the published version until then if a primary source doesn’t surface.
This article covers publicly available legal records and news reports current as of the write-up date above. Court cases change status often. A reader who needs current legal advice about a personal claim should speak with a licensed attorney rather than rely on this guide alone.
Musarat Bano is a content writer for JudicialOcean.com who covers lawsuits, legal news, and general legal topics. Her work focuses on research-based, informational content developed from publicly available sources and is intended to support public awareness. She does not provide legal advice or professional legal services.
