Aqueous film-forming foam (AFFF) has long been used to fight fires fueled by flammable liquids. A recent AFFF Lawsuit (Firefighting Foam Lawsuit) now highlights its health risks. You may qualify for legal compensation if exposed to firefighting foam and developed serious health problems.
You may qualify for legal compensation if exposed to firefighting foam and later developed serious health problems. AFFF, or aqueous film-forming foam, contains toxic PFAS chemicals. These chemicals have links to cancer and environmental damage. Several lawsuits now target companies that produced AFFF for failing to address these risks. This article explains key legal issues, health concerns, and options for seeking justice.
What is the AFFF Firefighting Foam Lawsuit, and What Does it Contain?
AFFF, or aqueous film-forming foam, is a specialized firefighting foam used to suppress Class B fires fueled by flammable liquids. It contains water, foaming agents, and PFAS chemicals. PFAS are synthetic compounds valued for resisting heat, water, and oil. However, they are called “forever chemicals” due to their long-lasting presence in the environment and the human body.
Why Are People Filing AFFF Lawsuit?
You should understand the reason behind mass tort cases. According to the victims, manufacturers allegedly sold AFFF without informing consumers of the health risks. It is crucial to realize that PFAS compounds do not readily decompose and remain in the human body. Certain cancers are more likely to develop as a result of this prolonged exposure.
The Environmental Working Group estimates that PFAS may be present in the drinking water of more than 200 million Americans. This data supports claims regarding extensive exposure. Thousands of PFAS-related lawsuits are filed against large corporations like 3M and DuPont.
AFFF Lawsuit Timeline
| Date | Event / Update |
|---|---|
| 2017–2018 | First AFFF cancer-related lawsuits filed. In 2018, cases consolidated into MDL-2873 (District of South Carolina). |
| 2019–2021 | Growth of PFAS scientific evidence; more firefighter and military exposure claims added. |
| Sept 2022 | Court rejects 3M’s “government contractor defense” for some AFFF claims, allowing more cases to proceed. |
| 2023 | Rapid growth in filings; ~3,700 cases pending in MDL by early 2023. Bellwether trial planning continues. |
| Early 2024 | Water-contamination settlements with multiple defendants begin emerging; personal-injury AFFF cases continue without a global settlement. |
| Late 2024 | Court schedules bellwether trials for AFFF kidney cancer and ulcerative colitis tracks, initially expected in 2025. |
| Jan 2025 | Total lawsuits reach ~7,633 pending. |
| Mar 2025 | Cases reach ~8,430. Judicial Ocean article published giving overview of MDL and qualifications. |
| Apr 2025 | MDL grows to ~8,928 cases. |
| May–Jun 2025 | Large spike in filings; many plaintiffs rush to join potential early settlement tiers. |
| Jul 2025 | MDL surpasses ~11,000 cases pending. |
| Aug 1, 2025 | MDL reaches 12,064 lawsuits. Additional bellwether selections underway. |
| Sep 2, 2025 | Total cases rise to 12,915. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | Court selects additional ulcerative colitis bellwether cases for trial sequencing. |
| Oct 2025 | First bellwether trial for kidney cancer expected, but court delays trial schedule. Growing indications of global settlement negotiations. |
| Nov 3, 2025 | MDL hits 15,249 active lawsuits — highest total to date. Settlement speculation intensifies. |
| Late 2025 | More talk about resolution frameworks. Courts push parties toward mediation and resolution pathways. No finalized global settlement yet. |
Who Qualifies for an AFFF Lawsuit?
You may qualify if you used AFFF regularly in your work or lived near contaminated water. It is essential to know that claimants often include:
- Firefighters in the military or at airports
- Chemical plant workers
- Residents near military bases
- People diagnosed with PFAS-related cancer
Medical records should be consulted to verify a diagnosis. Prostate, bladder, testicular, and kidney cancers are commonly associated with malignancies. Ulcerative colitis and thyroid issues may also be eligible.
What Health Risks Are Linked to Exposure to AFFF Lawsuit?
Numerous health issues have been connected to exposure to PFAS-containing AFFF. Long-term exposure to certain substances has been linked in studies to an elevated risk of several malignancies, including:
- Kidney Cancer: Research indicates a correlation between PFAS exposure and kidney malignancies.
- Testicular Cancer: Elevated incidences have been observed among individuals with significant AFFF exposure.
- Pancreatic Cancer: Emerging studies suggest potential links between PFAS and pancreatic tumors.
- Bladder Cancer: Associations have been noted, particularly among occupational users of AFFF.
In addition to cancer, exposure to PFAS has been linked to immune system problems, ulcerative colitis, thyroid illness, and liver damage. People affected by these health issues have taken legal action against AFFF producers.
How Do You Prove Exposure and Harm?
You must show that you had prolonged exposure to AFFF—medical records, employment history, and residence location matter here. Gathering documentation from hospitals, employers, or military service is essential.
In one example, a Navy firefighter in California developed kidney cancer after years of foam use. His case was accepted due to direct exposure and confirmed diagnosis. Cases like this support similar claims and help prove liability.
What Are the Main Legal Claims?
You should know that most lawsuits fall under product liability. Plaintiffs claim that companies failed to warn users. Other claims include design defects and corporate negligence.
Courts use scientific evidence to evaluate risk. You may hear the term “toxic tort” during legal discussions. This refers to harm caused by dangerous substances like PFAS.
What Is the Status of the AFFF MDL?
The lawsuits are now part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in South Carolina. MDL helps organize complex cases. Judges in MDL handle pretrial actions like evidence sharing and settlement talks.
According to public court files, more than 6,400 cases are still outstanding. The court initiated Bellwether cases to gauge jurors’ reactions, which may result in quicker settlements for subsequent claims.
How Much Can You Expect from a Settlement?
You may wonder how much compensation to expect. The value depends on exposure level, medical costs, and suffering. Top-tier cases involving cancer can settle for $200,000 to $500,000. Mid-tier cases may range from $150,000 to $300,000. Lower-tier cases often pay between $20,000 and $75,000.
So, you should speak to a qualified attorney to estimate your potential claim. Attorneys use medical reports and exposure history to value your case.
What Should You Do Before Filing?
You must act within the statute of limitations. Each state has its deadline, usually two to three years after diagnosis. So, missing this window could forfeit your right to sue.
You should also:
- Confirm diagnosis of a PFAS-related illness
- Gather proof of AFFF exposure
- Consult a lawyer familiar with toxic tort cases
- Avoid signing documents without legal advice
According to the American Bar Association, early legal help increases your chance of success. However, many law firms offer free consultations.
Why Should You Act Now?
You should not delay legal action. Courts move fast in MDL cases, and early filers often get higher settlements. Waiting could also risk missing the legal deadline.
Due to precise exposure, military veterans, municipal workers, and airport crews have more substantial claims. If you belong to one of these groups, your case could move faster through the legal process.
What Does PFAS Mean for Your Health?
PFAS chemicals are called “forever chemicals” because they never degrade. However, they can build up in the body over time, and even small amounts of exposure can have serious health consequences.
According to the CDC, there are strong connections between PFAS and immune dysfunction, liver damage, and thyroid problems. Research also links PFAS to decreased fertility and developmental issues in children.
Who Are the Companies Being Sued?
You should know that significant chemical companies face the bulk of the lawsuits. These include:
- 3M
- DuPont
- Chemours
- Tyco Fire Products
- Kidde-Fenwal
These companies made and sold AFFF for decades. Internal documents show they knew about PFAS dangers years ago, and courts use these records to prove corporate negligence.
What Can You Do If You Are Affected?
You can start by speaking with a law firm that handles AFFF claims. Look for firms with experience in product liability and mass torts. You should ask about past case outcomes and settlement history.
You can also join ongoing MDL cases or file an individual lawsuit. It is essential to act quickly. However, medical bills and legal fees can grow over time. An attorney can help secure compensation for your losses.
Conclusion
You may face serious health problems from AFFF exposure. You can take legal action to recover costs and hold companies accountable for AFFF Lawsuit. It is essential to know your legal options before deadlines pass. Early action gives you the best chance at fair compensation.
Must Read: What Should You Know About Victoria Bogner Allworth Lawsuit?
